In the corporate sphere , there are acts of wrongdoing that fly under the radar , and then there are stories that challenge the core of professional ethics . The narrative of David Collins, a manager at Ventia (formerly Broadspectrum) , exemplifies this type of scenario — a story of suspected unethical behavior that significantly damages the reputation of a specific individual but casts a shadow over the enterprise’s integrity.

Despite a range of troubling accusations , Collins has kept his position , appearing untouched by the controversies swirling around him . How has this been enabled to go on ? What does this say about Ventia’s dedication to accountability ? As per the accounts of those familiar, Collins’ history of unprofessional conduct started with violations of the business principles, but it didn’t cease there. Instead, it evolved into a chain of concerning actions that has left team members disenchanted and customers perplexed.

Amid a management development session —ironically aimed at enhancing leadership qualities —David Collins allegedly morphed what should have been a development chance into a chain of irresponsible incidents . Allegations indicate he spent company-sponsored junkets attempting to seduce female colleagues , a flagrant contravention of Ventia’s corporate ethics , all while his loved ones stayed unaware .

But the impropriety didn’t cease at those affairs. One of the most troubling discoveries involves his alleged exploitation of company IT systems to transmit indecent visuals to women—a significant exploitation of professional tools and a breach of trust . His reckless employment of Microsoft Teams to share flirtatious texts —including emoticons signaling illicit encounters — exposes a personality of a man apathetic to the fallout. Following these digital dalliances, Collins allegedly increased his behavior further: he is said to have engaged in romantic liaisons with an employee on numerous occurrences during business days , despite his current marriage and her having a spouse . This transparent exploitation of company time and resources contravened corporate etiquette but tore apart homes— leaving a path of mistrust that extended far beyond the workplace .

Why can this behavior be allowed to continue ? Why is it that a manager who has allegedly breached every guideline is still employed at Ventia? The answer , it appears, originates in a worrisome failure of governance within the organization . Complaints have been made , yet Collins persists unabated.

This lack of David Collins Venita consequence conveys a risky precedent : that authority and prestige within the firm can guard against punishment . It breeds a damaging work setting, dispirits the workforce , and ultimately harms the company’s standing .